OutKick87%

Brittney Griner throws Angel Reese to the floor like a rag doll in stunning show of power 85%

By Zach Dean87%

6/3/2026, 11:59:37 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Red Herring, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 388 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 77.5% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,092 of 20,371 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the article peer group.

Brittney Griner, the WNBA's most divisive player before Angel Reese, showed Angel who was still in charge Tuesday night. 
Griner  who famously spent some time in a Russian prison and was dealt back to America a few years ago in what was maybe the most lopsided trade of all time  threw Reese to the floor late in the fourth quarter and was assessed a Flagrant 1 foul. 
Now, should she have been fouled for this? 
I'm not sure. 
Did Angel flop? 
Maybe. 
Possibly. 
But the optics weren't great, and the refs made Griner pay. 
Take a look. 
What a mismatch: 
Did Angel Reese flop? 
First of all ... the size difference here is laughable. 
Amazing. 
Angel Reese is 6-3, and Griner (6-9) makes her look like a toddler. 
Nobody in the WNBA stands a chance against her, which, frankly, makes you wonder why she isn't a better player. 
How is Brittney Griner averaging only 4.6 rebounds per game this season? 
Seriously, how is that possible? 
She should be able to get at least 10 without putting in much effort at all. 
ANGEL REESE EXTENDS DOUBLE-DOUBLE STREAK WITH SEASON-HIGH 24 POINTS IN SKY'S WIN OVER SPARKS 
In what world is Angel Reese out-rebounding Brittney Griner? 
She did, though, last night! 
Reese finished with 13 rebounds, Griner finished with four. 
Lordy. 
Now, half of Reese's rebounds were on the offensive end, which usually means she missed 14 layups and grabbed her own shot, but still ... the point remains. 
As for the technical foul late in the game, I think it's 50-50. 
Looked a little floppy to me on Angel's end, but Griner's arms are also longer than Reese's sternum, so I'd imagine she just forgot she was there for a minute and ended up tossing her to the floor like a rag doll. 
CAITLIN CLARK SAYS WNBA IS 'SICK' OVER FEVER'S COMMISSIONER'S CUP TITLE 
No harm, no foul! 
Well, scratch that. 
No harm, yes foul. 
Oh well. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
As for the game, the Dream went on to win by double digits in something called the "Commissioner's Cup," which if you gave me 1,000 guesses I'd never be able to define. 
Seems fun, though! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.8%Zach Dean: 3.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias19.8%This article: 12.9%Zach Dean: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias12.9%This article: 3.1%Zach Dean: 4.9%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Zach Dean: 2.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias3.4%This article: 4.4%Zach Dean: 4.9%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Zach Dean: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias4.9%This article: 2.3%Zach Dean: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.3%This article: 26.3%Zach Dean: 11.4%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias26.3%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Zach Dean: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.8%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.1%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Zach Dean: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Zach Dean: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias7.7%This article: 13.1%Zach Dean: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect13.1%This article: 8.2%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias8.2%This article: 12.9%Zach Dean: 3.8%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem12.9%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.9%Zach Dean: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.6%Zach Dean: 9.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization18.6%This article: 21.1%Zach Dean: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring21.1%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.6%Zach Dean: 7.2%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion12.6%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 11.1%Zach Dean: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof11.1%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 20.6%Zach Dean: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal20.6%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 29.1%Zach Dean: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)29.1%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground3.4%This article: 14.9%Zach Dean: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity14.9%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%Zach Dean: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote7.2%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 66.0%Zach Dean: 19.6%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice66.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Dean: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Zach Dean: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.1%

388 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.