Keyword summary
84% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atlanta Dream results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 2,360 hits . Analysis detected 11,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,903 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,273 of 37,536 keywords). This Atlanta Dream is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Atlanta Dream
Keyword details
Total words: 7,903
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.9% 29.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst