OutKick87%

Caitlin Clark drops 21 points and 10 assists after WNBA used Raven Johnson in Fever promo graphics 92%

By Alejandro Avila0%

5/18/2026, 1:24:11 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 59.6% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 436 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.2% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,778 of 20,371 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.30% of the article peer group.

The WNBA’s marketing department might want to log off for a while. 
Just days after choosing Fever rookie Raven Johnson over generational superstar Caitlin Clark to front the promotional graphics for Sunday's matchup against the Seattle Storm, Indiana took the court and let the box score settle the discourse. 
CAITLIN CLARK MAKES WNBA HISTORY AFTER LEAGUE CORRECTS STAT SHEET AHEAD OF FEVER VS STORM MATCHUP 
Indiana secured a commanding 89-78 victory over Seattle, though the real story unfolded in the stark contrast between the league’s forced promotional face and the team's actual focal point, which was a marketing mishap made all the more hilarious by the sudden absence of the team's other primary star, Aliyah Boston. 
With Boston ruled out just before tip-off due to a lower leg injury, the spotlight on Caitlin Clark intensified. 
Clark, who was shockingly snubbed from the league’s official pre-game marketing material despite coming off a historic, stat-corrected 30-point performance against the Mystics, proved exactly why she is the biggest draw in women's basketball. 
Shouldering an even heavier load without Boston in the paint, Clark torched the Storm defense, dropping a team-high 21 points and dishing out 10 assists along with seven rebounds. 
OutKick founder Clay Travis sounded off on the league's ridiculous snub: "Was Michael Jordan ever not the lead graphic on any Bulls game when he was a member of the team? 
You can say this is a small thing, but I would guarantee you Bill Cartwright, Luc Longley & Bill Wennington never got the promo graphic over Jordan. 
Sell the stars! 
Marketing 101." 
On the flip side was Johnson. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
Thrust into the spotlight as the unexpected "poster child" for the Fever in the WNBA’s promotional rollout, Johnson’s on-court production miserably failed to match her sudden marketing billing. 
In 17 minutes of action off the bench, Johnson failed to register a single point, dropping a giant goose egg on the stat sheet. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
While her defensive energy contributed to the team’s depth, a scoreless night highlighted the utter absurdity of the league elevating a backup guard over the most prolific scorer in basketball history, especially on a night when the team was already missing its star center. 
Indiana walks away with a huge win, and the WNBA walks away with another glaring lesson in who actually drives the bus. 
Send us your thoughts: alejandro.avila@outkick.com / Follow along on X: @alejandroaveela 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.7%Alejandro Avila: 7.2%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias19.7%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Alejandro Avila: 5.1%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.4%This article: 6.4%Alejandro Avila: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.4%This article: 7.8%Alejandro Avila: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias7.8%This article: 6.2%Alejandro Avila: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias6.2%This article: 21.6%Alejandro Avila: 25.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect21.6%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 31.4%Alejandro Avila: 17.4%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias31.4%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.1%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.6%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority4.6%This article: 11.5%Alejandro Avila: 3.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma11.5%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 28.2%Alejandro Avila: 11.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization28.2%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.3%Alejandro Avila: 11.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 7.8%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question7.8%This article: 8.5%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.5%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division5.0%This article: 6.2%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.9%Alejandro Avila: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.9%This article: 59.6%Alejandro Avila: 24.3%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice59.6%This article: 0.7%Alejandro Avila: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.7%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 4.5%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Alejandro Avila: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.4%

436 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech373writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageClay Travis • 31 words • 0.0% coverageClay Travis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageClay Travis • 3 words • 100.0% coverageClay Travis • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Clay Travis

100%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words100% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Biased Writer Voice-69.7 ptsWriter: 69.7%Clay Travis: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Clay Travis: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+4.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Clay Travis: 4.8%4.8%Quote-first Misdirection-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Clay Travis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.