Topic summary
46% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indiana Fever results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 1,638 hits . Analysis detected 8,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,966 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,543 of 16,562 topics). This Indiana Fever is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Indiana Fever
Topic details
Total words: 8,966
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst