Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Storm results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 833 hits. Analysis detected 6,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,742 of 35,666 keywords). This Seattle Storm is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Seattle Storm
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
76%Seattle Storm (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,520
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.0%14.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate