Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Storm results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 833 hits. Analysis detected 6,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,520 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,651 of 16,562 topics). This Seattle Storm is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Seattle Storm
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,520
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 17.9%17.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.0%14.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 17.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos