OutKick87%

Minnesota Lynx home opener moment of silence for ICE shooting victims drowned out by anti-ICE chants 50%

By Alejandro Avila0%

5/11/2026, 12:27:30 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 558 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (10,328 of 20,372 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the article peer group.

Minnesota's Target Center turned into a political stage Saturday night as the Minnesota Lynx home opener against the Atlanta Dream was hijacked by a fan shouting anti-ICE sentiments. 
Before a public address announcer took the microphone, the Lynx organization held a moment of silence for Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti, two residents killed during federal immigration operations in January. 
The arena announcer then led the formal tribute, stating, "Please join us in honoring Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti with a moment of silence." 
He added, "We continue to extend our love, support and heartfelt sympathies to Renee and Alex's families, friends and our community." 
The quiet lasted seconds before a fan shouted "f--k ICE" from the stands. 
Cheers immediately broke out across the arena in response to the obscenity. 
The scene mirrored a Minnesota Timberwolves game from earlier this year, where the NBA franchise attempted a similar moment of silence for Renee Good. 
The Lynx organization has leaned heavily into the political narrative surrounding these deaths. 
Coach Cheryl Reeve has used her social media platforms to post "#ICEOUT." 
Ex-Lynx guard DiJonai Carrington has also used her personal platform to refer to federal agents as "masked criminals." 
The political firestorm has reached the highest levels of the NBA, at one point forcing Golden State Warriors coach Steve Kerr to issue a formal apology for his inflammatory and flat-out wrong commentary against ICE after OutKick asked him for clarification on his comments. 
Kerr had initially criticized federal agencies for their role in the January shootings, calling the government's narrative "shameful," but he admitted to misinterpreting the specific facts of the investigations during a pregame session at Chase Center in late February. 
"You’re right, I definitely misspoke, and I knew that ICE was arresting some criminals," Kerr told OutKick. 
"I immediately regretted it because I knew that to be the case. 
My point is that they’re also arresting people and detaining citizens and people who should not be being detained. 
The manner in which they’re doing it, as you see, is riling everybody up all over the country." 
Kerr continued, "Being in Minneapolis for those four days was incredibly emotional and powerful. 
It was a very difficult time for all of us... 
I misspoke, and I apologize for the misinformation. 
I hope everybody else out there who’s saying stuff that’s not true, please apologize, too. 
All right, let’s talk about basketball." 
The rage in Minneapolis centers on two specific events from earlier this year. 
On Jan. 
7, Renee Good was shot and killed by ICE officer Jonathan Ross. 
Federal officials claim Good used her vehicle to interfere with a lawful operation, while local activists dispute that account. 
On Jan. 
24, Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, was shot 10 times by Border Patrol agents. 
Video footage appeared to show Pretti recording the agents on his phone before a physical altercation began. 
The violence following Pretti's death was so severe that a Timberwolves game was postponed versus the Warriors to ensure public safety. 
While the Lynx lost a close 91-90 contest to the Dream on Saturday, the game itself was secondary to the continued vitriol against ICE stirring in the WNBA and NBA. 
Send us your thoughts: alejandro.avila@outkick.com / Follow along on X: @alejandroaveela 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.9%Alejandro Avila: 7.2%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Alejandro Avila: 5.1%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 4.3%Alejandro Avila: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Alejandro Avila: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 25.6%Alejandro Avila: 25.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect25.6%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Alejandro Avila: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.4%This article: 39.4%Alejandro Avila: 17.4%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias39.4%This article: 3.6%Alejandro Avila: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias3.6%This article: 3.4%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.4%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Alejandro Avila: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem3.2%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 8.8%Alejandro Avila: 3.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma8.8%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.8%Alejandro Avila: 11.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization16.8%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.3%Alejandro Avila: 11.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion23.3%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.0%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.7%Alejandro Avila: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.7%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal3.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.3%Alejandro Avila: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 35.1%Alejandro Avila: 24.3%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice35.1%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Alejandro Avila: 4.5%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.9%This article: 2.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.0%

558 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers27%attributed speech409writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageCheryl Reeve • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDiJonai Carrington • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Kerr • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

DiJonai Carrington

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words12% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+56.5 ptsWriter: 43.5%DiJonai Carrington: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -10.8 ptsWriter: 10.8%DiJonai Carrington: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%DiJonai Carrington: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%DiJonai Carrington: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.