Keyword summary
65% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Lynx results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 996 hits . Analysis detected 6,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,185 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (20,284 of 34,426 keywords). This Minnesota Lynx is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Minnesota Lynx
Keyword details
Total words: 7,185
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst