Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Flagrant Foul results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 2,986 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,753 topics). This Flagrant Foul is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Flagrant Foul
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 41.1%41.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.4%18.4%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 41.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Red Herring: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos