Fox News89%

Iran's Revolutionary Guard sidelines president as military grip expands 93%

By Efrat Lachter0%

4/21/2026, 3:00:30 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 826 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.9% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,630 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the article peer group.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the elite branch of the Iranian armed forces, has blocked President Masoud Pezeshkian’s presidential appointments and erected what sources described as a security cordon around Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, a report published Tuesday by Iran International said. 
The IRGC effectively has assumed control over key state functions, the report claimed. 
"It was always a matter of when, not if, the IRGC was going to step forward even more than it has in the last three decades," Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital. 
Pezeshkian has reached a "complete political deadlock" as tensions between his administration and the military leadership deepen, according to the report. 
IRAN'S CEASEFIRE PUSH MAY BE A 'CYCLE OF DECEPTION,' ANALYSTS WARN AS SHADOWY FIGURE GAINS POWER 
The reported shift could have major consequences far beyond Iran. 
Analysts say a more powerful IRGC likely would mean a more confrontational Iran, less willing to compromise in talks with Washington and more inclined to continue military escalation across the region. 
With U.S.-Iran negotiations already faltering and uncertainty growing over whether Tehran will even send negotiators to the next round of talks, the rise of the Revolutionary Guard raises fresh doubts about who actually is making decisions in Iran and whether any civilian official can still speak for the regime. 
"But it's a mistake to assume this is some sort of coup," Ben Taleblu said. 
"This has been the process in Iran for years now, as the regime has chosen conflict over cooperation and emboldened its security forces at every juncture." 
Pezeshkian's recent effort to appoint a new intelligence minister collapsed after direct pressure from IRGC commander Ahmad Vahidi, sources told Iran International, arguing that all proposed candidates, including former Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan, were rejected. 
Vahidi reportedly insisted that under wartime conditions, all critical and sensitive positions must be chosen and managed directly by the Revolutionary Guard until further notice. 
"By any standard, Vahidi is considered a radical even within the regime's hardline elite, and his rise is a warning that Tehran's war machine now calls the shots," Lisa Daftari, foreign policy analyst and journalist, told Fox News Digital. 
Under Iran's system, the president traditionally nominates an intelligence minister only after securing approval from the supreme leader. 
But with the condition and whereabouts of Mojtaba Khamenei unclear in recent weeks, the IRGC appears to be increasingly acting without civilian oversight. 
IRAN'S NEW SUPREME LEADER IS 'HIS FATHER ON STEROIDS,' EXPERTS WARN OF HARDLINE RULE 
The report claims Pezeshkian repeatedly has sought an urgent meeting with Khamenei but has been unable to establish contact. 
Instead, according to Iran International, a "military council" made up of senior IRGC officers now controls access to the center of power, preventing government reports from reaching Mojtaba and effectively isolating him from the elected government. 
Still, analysts say the reported power struggle reflects a longer trend in Iran, where the Revolutionary Guard has steadily expanded its influence over politics, the economy and national security. 
Ben Taleblu argued that Pezeshkian's apparent sidelining should not be viewed as a dramatic break from the past because the president never exercised significant independent authority. 
"Those who worry about Pezeshkian's potential sidelining need to consider what he realistically was or wasn't able to do mere months ago when the regime slaughtered 40,000 Iranians in the streets," he said. 
Pezeshkian, elected in 2025 on promises of moderation and reform, has repeatedly found himself constrained by the security establishment and the clerical leadership. 
The latest report suggests that dynamic has intensified dramatically as Iran faces growing external pressure and internal uncertainty. 
One of the most striking claims involves Ali Asghar Hejazi, a powerful security official inside the office of the supreme leader. 
LETHAL ELITE 'BLACK-CLAD' KILL SQUAD GUARDS IRAN'S NEW SUPREME LEADER MOJTABA KHAMENEI 
Some of Mojtaba Khamenei's associates are now trying to push Hejazi out because he opposed Mojtaba succeeding his father, according to Iran International. 
The report said Hejazi warned members of the Assembly of Experts that Mojtaba lacked the qualifications to become supreme leader and that hereditary succession would violate the principles laid out by Ali Khamenei. 
Hejazi reportedly also warned that putting Mojtaba in power would effectively hand the country to the Revolutionary Guard and permanently sideline civilian institutions. 
That warning increasingly appears to reflect what is already happening. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
The Revolutionary Guard, created after the 1979 Islamic Revolution to defend the regime, has long evolved far beyond a military force. 
It now controls major sections of Iran's economy, oversees the country's missile and nuclear programs, and exerts influence across nearly every branch of government. 
Analysts say the latest developments suggest the IRGC is no longer operating behind the scenes, but is openly emerging as the dominant force in Tehran. 
Iran's mission to the United Nations declined to comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.4%Efrat Lachter: 4.7%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias19.4%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 18.4%Efrat Lachter: 3.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic18.4%This article: 10.3%Efrat Lachter: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic10.3%This article: 4.4%Efrat Lachter: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.4%This article: 4.1%Efrat Lachter: 4.9%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias4.1%This article: 22.9%Efrat Lachter: 10.7%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect22.9%This article: 4.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion4.0%This article: 3.5%Efrat Lachter: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 2.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.1%Efrat Lachter: 4.1%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias20.1%This article: 44.6%Efrat Lachter: 10.0%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias44.6%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Efrat Lachter: 1.3%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Efrat Lachter: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 5.6%Efrat Lachter: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Efrat Lachter: 1.3%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem4.0%This article: 1.8%Efrat Lachter: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man1.8%This article: 26.5%Efrat Lachter: 8.1%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority26.5%This article: 9.1%Efrat Lachter: 2.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma9.1%This article: 11.4%Efrat Lachter: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope11.4%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 27.6%Efrat Lachter: 4.5%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization27.6%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.4%Efrat Lachter: 6.1%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion19.4%This article: 3.1%Efrat Lachter: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question3.1%This article: 10.2%Efrat Lachter: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.2%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.7%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 28.8%Efrat Lachter: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)28.8%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Efrat Lachter: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 3.6%Efrat Lachter: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection3.6%This article: 5.8%Efrat Lachter: 1.9%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice5.8%This article: 6.2%Efrat Lachter: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination6.2%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Efrat Lachter: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Efrat Lachter: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

826 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers22%attributed speech641writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBehnam Ben Taleblu • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageBen Taleblu • 15 words • 0.0% coverageBen Taleblu • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Daftari • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageBen Taleblu • 26 words • 0.0% coverageBen Taleblu • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lisa Daftari

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words21% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+98.6 ptsWriter: 1.4%Lisa Daftari: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination+98.1 ptsWriter: 1.9%Lisa Daftari: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Lisa Daftari: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%Lisa Daftari: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.