Keyword summary
85% 45 analyzed articles/videos 30,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War With Iran results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 16,357 hits . Analysis detected 155,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 129,217 analyzed words across 45 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,810 of 37,536 keywords). This War With Iran is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. War With Iran
Keyword details
Total words: 129,217
Article count: 45
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score45 analyzed articles129.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst