Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Weinthal results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 3,226 hits . Analysis detected 24,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,445 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,451 of 6,628 authors). This Benjamin Weinthal is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Benjamin Weinthal
Author details
Total words: 16,445
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst