Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War-With-Iran results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 511 hits . Analysis detected 3,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,576 of 15,769 topics). This War-With-Iran is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. War-With-Iran
Topic details
Total words: 4,240
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst