Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Tilsley results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,456 hits . Analysis detected 15,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,912 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,003 of 6,194 authors). This Paul Tilsley is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Paul Tilsley
Author details
Total words: 14,912
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst