Fox News89%

WATCH: Platner doesn't apologize to Purple Heart recipient, voters when confronted on post mocking soldier 17%

By Andrew Mark Miller0%

5/24/2026, 8:00:34 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 677 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of 17% (16,788 of 20,099 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the article peer group.

FIRST ON FOX: SULLIVAN, ME  Democratic Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner declined to apologize both to voters and a Purple Heart recipient when asked by Fox News Digital about a deleted Reddit post where he said the wounded soldier "didn’t deserve to live." 
Platner did not respond at first when asked outside a market near his home whether he regrets making the post, which Fox News Digital reported earlier this week showed him mocking a video of Pfc. 
Ted Daniels taken during a clash with Taliban fighters in 2012 that ended in Daniels being shot four times and being awarded a Purple Heart. 
"I did four tours in the infantry, any attempt to say that I disrespect veterans is slanderous and offensive," Platner said when asked follow-up questions about what he would say to any Maine voters who were offended by his post and if he should apologize to Daniels. 
"Do you think you owe him an apology?" 
Fox News Digital asked again. 
"Do you know how many of my friends have Purple Hearts, do you know how many of my friends got wounded?" 
Platner responded, before adding, "yeah, a lot of them, thank you." 
Platner, a U.S. 
Marine Corps veteran, sparked significant outrage online this week over the resurfaced Reddit post critics have said shows a lack of respect for his fellow soldiers. 
"This video never gets old," Platner posted in June 2019 using the Reddit account "P-Hustle," which he has acknowledged owning, in reference to a viral video from the helmet Daniels was wearing while taking enemy fire. 
"Dumb motherf----- didn't deserve to live. 
At least his stupidity and fat a-- wheezing are available for all future infantrymen to witness and hold in contempt. 
Poor marksmanship on the Taliban's part is the only reason this mouthbreather made it home. 
He managed to make every possible s--- decision possible when it comes to small unit combat." 
Rob O’Neill, the U.S. 
Navy SEAL who is credited with killing Usama bin Laden, was one of many veterans to speak out in response to the post. 
"Mr. 
Platner was way out of line talking about a soldier that way," O’Neill told Fox News Digital about the controversy on Thursday. 
"This is completely barbaric," O’Neill added. 
"I don't understand. 
If you swear an oath to the country, it doesn't even matter what the politics are. 
Every single time you fight it's for the man next to you, it’s for the person next to you. 
Politics goes out the window. 
And to wish ill on someone like that under fire is just, you know, like I said, it is the opposite of everything I've ever been raised to believe." 
Platner has previously leaned into his struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to explain the numerous incendiary social media posts that have surfaced since he announced his Senate run. 
"For those of you who have read these things and been offended, have read these things and seen someone that you don’t recognize, I am deeply sorry," Platner said in October before the post about Daniels, and other posts disparaging the military, were public. 
"I’m sorry for this. 
Just know that it’s not reflective at all of who I am. 
I don’t want you to judge me on the dumbest thing I ever wrote on the internet. 
I would prefer if people could judge me on the person I am today." 
Daniels himself reacted to the post, telling Fox Business, "People like this don't say stuff like this to my face." 
"It's online, and that right there tells me, Graham, you're a coward." 
Platner became the Democrats' presumptive nominee after his rival for the nomination, two-term Gov. 
Janet Mills, ended her campaign last month after trailing Platner in polling and fundraising. 
The Democratic Senate Primary in Maine will be held on June 9, where Platner will appear on the ballot alongside Democrat David Costello to earn the right to face off against incumbent Republican Sen. 
Susan Collins. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 5.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.9%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Andrew Mark Miller: 10.9%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.4%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 8.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias8.0%This article: 29.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 10.3%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias29.0%This article: 18.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias18.3%This article: 4.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.3%This article: 4.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias5.0%This article: 5.2%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 5.2%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.4%Andrew Mark Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority13.4%This article: 7.1%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma7.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.8%Andrew Mark Miller: 5.4%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization10.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.4%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon3.4%This article: 9.5%Andrew Mark Miller: 7.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion9.5%This article: 4.4%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question4.4%This article: 2.1%Andrew Mark Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.8%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.7%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal6.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.1%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading6.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.1%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote12.1%This article: 10.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection10.3%This article: 22.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.9%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice22.0%This article: 6.5%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination6.5%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.9%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

677 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers59%attributed speech276writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 36 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 6 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 20 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 1 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 3 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRob O’Neill • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 44 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTed Daniels • 20 words • 100.0% coverageTed Daniels • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ted Daniels

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words8.0% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+53.1 ptsWriter: 9.4%Ted Daniels: 62.5%62.5%Biased Writer Voice-54.0 ptsWriter: 54.0%Ted Daniels: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Ted Daniels: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.