Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterans Affairs results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 766 hits. Analysis detected 6,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,004 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,441 of 15,447 topics). This Veterans Affairs is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Veterans Affairs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,004
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos