Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Barron results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 2,034 hits . Analysis detected 16,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,380 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,112 of 6,296 authors). This Sam Barron is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Sam Barron
Author details
Total words: 13,380
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst