Newsmax75%

Pollster Allocco to Newsmax: Swalwell Exit Reshapes Calif. Governor's Race 0%

By Sam Barron0%

4/14/2026, 2:32:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Representativeness Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 489 faulty-reasoning hits from 468 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Polling expert Patrick Allocco told Newsmax on Monday that the California governor's race has been reshaped by the sexual assault allegations that forced Rep. 
Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., to exit. 
Swalwell, who was the leading Democrat in the polls, dropped out of the race Sunday after multiple women accused him of sexual assault. 
On Monday, he announced he was resigning from Congress. 
"It blows the race wide open," Allocco said on "Finnerty." 
California has a jungle primary system. 
The top two vote getters, regardless of party, advance to a general election. 
"Swalwell's exit doesn't just hurt one Democrat. 
It increases the odds that the Democrats keep splitting their vote while Republicans stay consolidated," Allocco said. 
"That's the danger for the Dems. 
If they don't unify quickly around a replacement front-runner, you can absolutely get a top-two scenario with Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco," he added. 
"This race just became a huge math problem." 
Allocco acknowledged Republicans face an uphill battle to retake the governor's mansion. 
"It will be difficult to win, but it is very possible," he said, noting that 60% of registered voters in California are Democrats. 
The pollster also dismissed rumblings that former Vice President Kamala Harris could run as an independent. 
Harris ruled out running for governor earlier this year. 
"In a jungle primary, that would be political malpractice. 
Democrats are already worried that there's too many Democrats splitting the vote among them, and that Hilton, Bianco would get through," Allocco said. 
"Harris would make that outcome more likely." 
Allocco said he wasn't surprised by polling that showed Harris as the current Democrat front-runner for president in 2028. 
"Harris has national name ID, so in the early polling that shows strength. 
But that's recognition, not voter consolidation. 
And that's the tell," he said. 
"If Democrats were settled, you wouldn't be seeing this conversation about a [Texas State Rep. 
James] Talarico clone. 
They're searching and heading for a messy primary to sort it all out." 
GET TODAY NEWSMAX+: 
NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America with more than 30 million people watching! 
Reuters Institute reports NEWSMAX is one of the top news brands in the U.S. 
You need to watch NEWSMAX today. 
Get it with great shows from Rob Schmitt, Greta Van Susteren, Greg Kelly, Carl Higbie, Rob Finnerty  and many more! 
Find the NEWSMAX channel on your cable system  Go Here Now 
BEST OFFER: 
Sign up for NEWSMAX+ and get NEWSMAX, our streaming channel NEWSMAX2 and our military channel World at War. 
Find hundreds of shows, movies and specials. 
Even get Jon Voight's special series and President Trump's comedy programs and much more! 
Watch NEWSMAX+ on your smartphone or home TV app. 
Watch NEWSMAX anytime, anywhere! 
Start your FREE trial now: NewsmaxPlus.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.7%Sam Barron: 2.5%Newsmax: 3.4%Confirmation Bias13.7%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.6%Newsmax: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 2.8%Newsmax: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.7%Sam Barron: 0.3%Newsmax: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.7%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.7%Newsmax: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Sam Barron: 8.8%Newsmax: 3.8%Overconfidence Bias6.6%This article: 8.8%Sam Barron: 8.1%Newsmax: 11.0%Framing Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.1%Newsmax: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.5%Newsmax: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Sam Barron: 5.3%Newsmax: 4.1%Optimism Bias2.6%This article: 2.8%Sam Barron: 0.9%Newsmax: 2.9%Pessimism Bias2.8%This article: 6.8%Sam Barron: 6.9%Newsmax: 10.3%Negativity Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 2.9%Newsmax: 3.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.9%Newsmax: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Sam Barron: 15.2%Newsmax: 2.7%In-Group Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.7%Newsmax: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 5.4%Newsmax: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.1%Newsmax: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Sam Barron: 0.5%Newsmax: 1.9%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.7%Newsmax: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.2%Newsmax: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.8%Sam Barron: 3.3%Newsmax: 4.8%Appeal to Authority6.8%This article: 6.6%Sam Barron: 1.4%Newsmax: 2.4%False Dilemma6.6%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.7%Newsmax: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.5%Newsmax: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.4%Sam Barron: 10.8%Newsmax: 4.2%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 0.6%Sam Barron: 0.7%Newsmax: 0.3%Red Herring0.6%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.6%Newsmax: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.9%Sam Barron: 11.7%Newsmax: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion1.9%This article: 6.2%Sam Barron: 1.5%Newsmax: 1.1%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 1.5%Sam Barron: 1.9%Newsmax: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.5%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 1.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.2%Newsmax: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Sam Barron: 1.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.2%Sam Barron: 1.2%Newsmax: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.2%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.2%Sam Barron: 0.1%Newsmax: 0.2%Middle Ground3.2%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.9%Newsmax: 3.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.1%Sam Barron: 1.1%Newsmax: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 2.2%Newsmax: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 4.4%Newsmax: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 4.3%Newsmax: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Barron: 3.0%Newsmax: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

468 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker41%attributed speech278writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 7 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 17 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 6 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 23 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 6 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 6 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 15 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 3 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Allocco • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Patrick Allocco

100%flagged-word coverage
190 attributed words100% of attributed speech37% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection+5.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Patrick Allocco: 5.3%5.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.