Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Controversy results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,118 hits. Analysis detected 7,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,108 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,998 of 15,478 topics). This Social Media Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Social Media Controversy
Topic details
Total words: 5,108
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.9%21.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 14.5%14.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos