Keyword summary
73%3 analyzed articles/videos1,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marines results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 819 hits. Analysis detected 6,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,021 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (20,919 of 34,832 keywords). This Marines is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Marines
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
40%Marines (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,021
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.3%10.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate