Fox News87%

Walz approval rating craters to lowest level ever and trails Trump amid massive fraud scandal: 'Tired of it' 75%

By Andrew Mark Miller0%

6/19/2026, 11:00:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 2,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 753 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,153 of 20,371 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the article peer group.

Minnesota Gov. 
Tim Walz’s approval rating in his state has plummeted to a level below President Donald Trump as the state's top executive continues to face blowback from the massive fraud scandal that erupted under his watch. 
Walz, who is leaving office in January after announcing he will not run for re-election, has an approval rating of 39% in the state and a disapproval rating of 53% with 8% not sure, according to a new poll conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling and Strategy Inc. for KARE 11, the Minnesota Star Tribune, and the University of Minnesota's Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication. 
The poll surveyed 800 Minnesota registered voters likely to participate in the November general election via live telephone interviews from June 8-10, 2026 and the numbers represent Walz’s lowest approval rating since taking office six years ago. 
On the fraud issue, 45% of voters say they trust Republicans to fix it compared to 38% who chose Democrats and 14% who said neither party. 
FINAL WALZ FRAUD REPORT RIPS ‘CULTURE OF TOLERANCE’ AS MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS FACE BILLIONS IN ALLEGED LOSSES 
The same polling unit registered Trump's approval rating in the state at 41% this week, which conservatives on social media took notice of. 
"Tim Walz has a lower approval rating than President Trump in deep blue Minnesota right now," Townhall columnist Dustin Grage posted on X. 
"That’s how toxic the fraud has become for Democrats." 
Over the past year, the Trump administration has taken a major interest in Minnesota and unleashed its fraud task force into the state, resulting in raids, arrests and further investigations into how the fraud was able to grow so quickly in the state. 
Another contentious issue revealed by the poll is Minnesota’s new state flag, supported by Walz, that 50% of voters say they disapprove of. 
The state’s new flag has become a cultural and political flashpoint in a state already reeling from one of the largest fraud scandals in U.S. history, heavily involving the Somali immigrant community. 
The flag was approved by a 13-member commission created by the Democratic-controlled legislature in 2023. 
Critics of the flag say it is overly simplistic and some have even knocked it as bearing a resemblance to Somalia’s national flag. 
MINNESOTA LAWMAKERS UNLOAD ON WALZ'S 'LEGACY' AFTER HE TOUTS FRAUD RECORD IN FINAL ADDRESS: 'RIDICULOUS' 
"Two issues that unite a majority of Minnesotans are the rejection of Tim Walz and his failed policies and our hatred for the Minnesota Somali state flag," Republican House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, who represents Minnesota's 6th Congressional District, told Fox News Digital. 
"The flag is an embarrassment and good on the cities who are actively removing it from their city halls and communities." 
"President Trump is more popular than Tim Walz in his home state because Minnesotans are sick and tired of Walz siding with illegal aliens and Somali fraudsters over his hardworking, taxpaying constituents." he continued. 
"The legacy of Tim Walz will be the fires that destroyed Minneapolis, the fraud that he allowed to be stolen under his watch, and his failures that have harmed our great state." 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Fraud appears to have played a significant role in Walz's cratering approval, which is evidenced by a 10-point drop in his support since last year as the fraud scandal has dominated headlines. 
Only 1% of Republicans in the state say they approve of the job Walz is doing, along with 73% of Democrats and 32% of Independents. 
"America rejected Tim Walz in 2024," Republican Minnesota State Sen. 
Michael Holmstrom told Fox News Digital. 
"Now Minnesotans are following suit. 
The good news for Tim is that, now that his record is on full display, he could soon be the most popular guy in the jailhouse." 
Republican State Sen. 
Mark Koran told Fox News Digital that the polls "really tell you what Gov. 
Walz has done to himself." 
"He let his fraud crisis blow up and didn’t do anything to fix it while he was busy shoving all this radical stuff into state government," Koran said. 
"After years of extreme far-left ideology and policies that don’t help normal people, Minnesotans have had enough. 
His legacy is going to be the fraud crisis and desecrating the state flag. 
Minnesota is just tired of it." 
Fox News Digital reached out to Walz’s office for comment. 
Fox News Digital’s Peter Pinedo contributed to this report 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.6%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.1%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic16.3%This article: 6.8%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.9%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias1.9%This article: 14.2%Andrew Mark Miller: 10.9%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect14.2%This article: 4.5%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion4.5%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias9.6%This article: 42.4%Andrew Mark Miller: 10.3%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias42.4%This article: 4.5%Andrew Mark Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias4.5%This article: 15.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error15.3%This article: 3.7%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.7%This article: 15.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias15.3%This article: 4.2%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.8%This article: 6.9%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 5.2%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Andrew Mark Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 4.5%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma4.5%This article: 5.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope5.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 5.4%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization11.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.2%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon10.2%This article: 12.7%Andrew Mark Miller: 7.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion12.7%This article: 3.7%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question3.7%This article: 28.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)28.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.8%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division2.8%This article: 2.3%Andrew Mark Miller: 1.7%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal2.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.1%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 10.8%Andrew Mark Miller: 2.9%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice10.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Andrew Mark Miller: 3.9%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias15.9%This article: 1.1%Andrew Mark Miller: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

753 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers41%attributed speech447writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 65 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDustin Grage • 23 words • 100.0% coverageDustin Grage • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageTom Emmer • 43 words • 0.0% coverageTom Emmer • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTom Emmer • 34 words • 0.0% coverageTom Emmer • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Holmstrom • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Holmstrom • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Holmstrom • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMark Koran • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMark Koran • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMark Koran • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMark Koran • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMark Koran • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMark Koran • 6 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 10 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Pinedo • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Holmstrom

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words13% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Politically Right Leaning -0.2 ptsWriter: 24.6%Michael Holmstrom: 24.4%24.4%Biased Writer Voice-18.1 ptsWriter: 18.1%Michael Holmstrom: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Michael Holmstrom: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.