Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fraud Scandals results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 687 hits. Analysis detected 5,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,785 topics). This Fraud Scandals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fraud Scandals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 22.6%22.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.2%9.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos