Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota-Fraud-Exposed results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 642 hits. Analysis detected 3,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,015 of 16,558 topics). This Minnesota-Fraud-Exposed is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Minnesota-Fraud-Exposed
Topic details
Total words: 2,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.6%17.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.0%25.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos