Author summary
12%4 analyzed articles/videos3,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Wayne Ferguson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 667 hits. Analysis detected 5,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,037 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,690 of 6,367 authors). This John Wayne Ferguson is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
John Wayne Ferguson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
11%John Wayne Ferguson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,037
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate