Publication summary
41% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Enquirer results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Status Quo Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 354 hits . Analysis detected 2,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,707 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 42% (221 of 379 publications). This The Enquirer is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,707
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst