Author summary
57%2 analyzed articles/videos1,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sohrab Ahmari results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,515 hits. Analysis detected 8,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,212 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,217 of 6,279 authors). This Sohrab Ahmari is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Sohrab Ahmari
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
49%Sohrab Ahmari (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,212
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510048.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.0%21.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos