UnHerd72%
Risk of Catholic schism has rallied traditionalists behind Pope Leo 57%
By Sohrab Ahmari57%
6/30/2026, 3:30:18 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 76.4% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 521 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,220 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the article peer group.
Pope Leo XIV this week faces his first real crisis as head of the Catholic Church.
The Society of Saint Pius X, an ultra-traditionalist breakaway group, is poised to consecrate four bishops without papal authorization.
On Monday, the Roman Pontiff addressed a final appeal to SSPX leaders, warning them that their “schismatic act” would amount to a “sin of extreme gravity”, and hinting that the society could lose its faculty to perform certain sacraments.
What’s surprising, though, is that nearly all the notable traditionalist voices in the Church hierarchy and among the laity are lining up behind the Pope, rather than the SSPX.
This, notwithstanding some “trad” malcontents grumbling about Leo’s commitment to social-justice issues, as they did with his immediate predecessor.
The origins of the crisis lie in the aftermath of the Second Vatican Council more than 60 years ago.
Rejecting the council’s liturgical reforms and emphasis on religious liberty (within the limits of the common good), French archbishop Marcel Lefebvre founded the society in 1970 with the explicit intention of maintaining preconciliar norms.
The break came with Lefebvre’s decision in 1988 to consecrate four SSPX bishops on his own authority.
Pope John Paul II declared that, under canon law, Lefebvre and these four bishops had incurred automatic excommunication for their schismatic act.
Yet the successors of Peter continued to nurture hopes of reconciliation.
In an act of mercy in 2009, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunication of the four new bishops (Lefebvre had already died by then).
A few years later, Benedict’s successor Francis granted SSPX priests the faculty to hear confessions and witness Christian marriages.
In his warning letter this week, Leo alluded to his predecessors’ gestures of Petrine “affection”, made in recognition of “the devotion to liturgical life, commitment to priestly formation, apostolic zeal, and desire for fidelity to Tradition” that characterizes individual members.
Yet the SSPX seems undeterred, and is seemingly prepared for a full schism from the Roman communion.
What has surprised many observers, however, is the swiftness with which more mainstream forces in the traditionalist movement have condemned the SSPX in defense of the Pope’s course of action.
*Rorate Caeli*, the hugely influential trad blog that opposed the Francis papacy over its supposedly liberal direction, warned the SSPX today that “Leo XIV is filled with the heart of Saint Peter and the epistolary sincerity of Saint Paul.
Catholics should listen closely.”
Likewise, Eric Sammons, the Editor-in-Chief of the trad organ *Crisis*, wrote this morning: “I appreciate that the Holy Father is acting as a father here, making clear what he is forbidding, and urging his children to avoid that path.
I pray the SSPX leadership would stand down.”
Cardinal Robert Sarah, who has previously been tipped as a long-shot trad contender for the papacy, lamented earlier this year how the SSPX’s decision had caused a “new tear in the seamless garment of the Church”.
Why the society insists on going ahead with unlawful consecrations, despite the warnings of responsible traditional forces, will remain a mystery.
It is, Catholics might say, the “mystery of evil”.
Speakers
6speakers40%attributed speech315writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageRorate Caeli
43 attributed words21% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.