Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rorate Caeli results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 90.7% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 315.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,106 of 28,364 speakers). This Rorate Caeli is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Rorate Caeli
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
51.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 90.7%90.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 68.0%68.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 68.0%68.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 90.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 68.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 68.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos