Author summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Daily News Editorial Board results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.2% saturation with 2,033 hits . Analysis detected 8,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,311 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,070 of 6,628 authors). This New York Daily News Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. New York Daily News Editorial Board
Author details
Total words: 4,311
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 47.2% 47.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.6% 14.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.1% 23.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 47.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 11.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst