NYC hit with storms, flash floods, braces for winds, hail, possible tornado 66%

By Jessica Schladebeck63% Nicholas Williams57%

7/18/2026, 3:06:39 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 65.6% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 929 faulty-reasoning hits from 425 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.2% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,062 of 20,499 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the article peer group.

After days of smoky skies and heavy heat, New York on Saturday was hit with “pea-sized hail” and flash flooding that saw numerous drivers swamped and trapped across the boroughs as severe weather hit the city. 
New York City Emergency Management urged New Yorkers to stay inside as strong thunderstorms, possibly with quarter-inch-sized hail, were forecast to plague parts of Brooklyn, Manhattan, Staten Island and Queens. 
“Thunderstorms are expected to bring damaging winds strong enough to down trees and power lines, along with heavy rainfall that could cause flash flooding,” Mayor Mamdani said on X late Friday. 
Similarly, NYCEM warned, “The main threat with the strongest storms is damaging wind gusts of 50 to 70 mph,” adding, “An isolated tornado cannot be ruled out.” 
As the thunderstorms swept through the city, the entrance to the Roosevelt Ave.-Jackson Heights subway station was inundated with heavy rain, sending water pouring into the station, forcing commuters to navigate flooded walkways, according to ABC 7. 
Mamdani further warned that the storms could develop with “little warning” and urged residents to immediately head indoors should one suddenly strike. 
He also encouraged residents to avoid travel. 
“I remind everyone to take this weather seriously: Take precautions, know what to do if a storm reaches your area,” Gov. 
Kathy Hochul added, “and don’t forget to check on friends and family members who might need assistance.” 
The severe weather left drivers stranded on highways in Queens and streets in a number of different neighborhoods flooded. 
The poor weather conditions left planes departing out of John F. 
Kennedy, Newark and LaGuardia airports with massive flight cancellations and delays. 
The rainfall began late Saturday morning, continuing on and off throughout the day. 
The storms were expected to be at their most severe between 4 p.m. and 8 p.m., the National Weather Service said. 
The National Weather Service placed the city under a flood watch from 10 a.m. 
Saturday till 2 a.m. 
Sunday, with rainfall totals expected to be around 1 to 1.5 inches, with 2 to 4 inches possible in some areas. 
The city has been under an Air Quality Alert since Wednesday due to Canadian wildfires. 
The haze was expected to hang around for part of Saturday  but the good news is that the rain should help clear out the smoke over much of the tristate area. 
“Yes, the rain should likely finally rinse the smoke out of the sky,” NYCEM said on X. 
“No, it could not do so gently.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 6.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias4.9%This article: 19.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 5.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic19.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 7.2%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect23.8%This article: 6.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion6.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 18.6%Jessica Schladebeck: 3.7%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias18.6%This article: 4.9%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 65.6%Jessica Schladebeck: 10.5%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias65.6%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 3.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 4.0%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.9%Jessica Schladebeck: 5.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority21.9%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 4.3%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 9.3%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.5%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.8%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.6%Jessica Schladebeck: 3.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.6%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.3%Jessica Schladebeck: 5.2%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote7.3%This article: 4.5%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.5%This article: 8.5%Jessica Schladebeck: 7.6%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice8.5%This article: 22.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination22.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

425 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers59%attributed speech174writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageNew York City Emergency Management • 30 words • 100.0% coverageMayor Mamdani • 31 words • 100.0% coverageNYCEM • 27 words • 0.0% coverageABC 7 • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMamdani • 22 words • 100.0% coverageMamdani • 7 words • 100.0% coverageGov. • 21 words • 100.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 21 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageNYCEM • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNYCEM • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words12% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%New York City Emergency Management: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.7 ptsWriter: 20.7%New York City Emergency Management: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%New York City Emergency Management: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.