Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos91.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Emergency Management results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 199.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,142 of 28,364 speakers). This New York City Emergency Management is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
New York City Emergency Management

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
20.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos91.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.1%29.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos