Gothamist76%

NYC’s wildfire smoke clears after second-worst event in modern record 69%

By Michael Sol Warren74%

7/19/2026, 8:27:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 446 faulty-reasoning hits from 340 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,742 of 21,203 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the article peer group.

The haze has lifted, the campfire smell has faded and New York City can breathe a little easier. 
For now. 
City officials said New York has weathered its second-most severe smoke event in the city's modern record, as smoke from Canadian wildfires moved out of the region after a shift in weather patterns and Saturday’s storms. 
But they warned that as long as wildfires continue burning in Canada, there’s a chance heavy smoke could return. 
New York spent days enveloped in smoke that sent air pollution to dangerously high levels, starting Wednesday. 
The event peaked at 10 p.m. 
Thursday, officials said, when the Air Quality Index for the region measured 289. 
City officials said only the June 2023 wildfire smoke event was more severe, when air quality reached hazardous levels. 
The week’s smoke came as a heat wave also gripped the region. 
The heat broke Saturday with a wave of heavy thunderstorms, which brought flooding to the city but also helped clear much of the smoke from the air. 
By Sunday morning, the region’s AQI was 78  considered moderate air quality. 
Mayor Zohran Mamdani and his administration on Sunday touted the city’s response to the smoke and heat. 
That included handing out masks, keeping nearly 600 cooling centers open and continuing outreach to vulnerable New Yorkers. 
"This past week, smoke from the Canadian wildfires blanketed our city in the middle of a dangerous heat emergency. 
And once again, New Yorkers showed what makes this city extraordinary: we showed up for one another," Mamdani said in a statement. 
Nearly 200 wildfires were still burning northwest of Thunder Bay in Ontario as of Saturday, according to provincial officials cited by New York City Emergency Management. 
The agency said 73 of the fires were considered out of control and roughly 1.7 million acres had burned. 
The threat of smoke returning to the New York region continues as long as the fires burn and weather patterns carry smoke toward the city, officials said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.9%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Michael Sol Warren: 2.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias7.6%This article: 7.9%Michael Sol Warren: 3.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Michael Sol Warren: 8.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 3.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Michael Sol Warren: 2.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias13.5%This article: 21.5%Michael Sol Warren: 10.3%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias21.5%This article: 5.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias5.0%This article: 7.9%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error7.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Michael Sol Warren: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.8%Michael Sol Warren: 4.3%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority23.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 2.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.5%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon6.5%This article: 5.6%Michael Sol Warren: 7.7%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.5%Michael Sol Warren: 2.2%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 4.1%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Michael Sol Warren: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 5.6%Michael Sol Warren: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection5.6%This article: 5.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.7%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Sol Warren: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

340 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers36%attributed speech219writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 17 words • 100.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 18 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 19 words • 100.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 22 words • 0.0% coverageNew York City Emergency Management • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNew York City Emergency Management • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Zohran Mamdani

76%flagged-word coverage
76 attributed words63% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zohran Mamdani: 25.0%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zohran Mamdani: 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer Voice+22.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zohran Mamdani: 22.4%22.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.