Speaker summary
55% 141 analyzed articles/videos 10,897.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zohran Mamdani results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 1,326.595 hits . Analysis detected 14,961.659 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,897.667 analyzed words across 141 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,466 of 25,518 speakers). This Zohran Mamdani is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Zohran Mamdani
Speaker details
Total words: 10,897.667
Article count: 141
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score141 analyzed videos10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst