Publication summary
74% 55 analyzed articles/videos 10,986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The FP results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 10,275 hits . Analysis detected 80,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 66,648 analyzed words across 55 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (139 of 379 publications). This The FP is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 66,648
Article count: 55
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score55 analyzed articles66.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 15.4% 15.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst