Author summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos543 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rupa Subramanya results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 2,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,965 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (2,108 of 6,628 authors). This Rupa Subramanya is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Rupa Subramanya
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠69%Rupa Subramanya (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,965
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Composition/Division: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos