A Letter to the Free-Speech Hypocrite Who Ran PEN America 75%

By William Kolbrener90%

7/21/2026, 11:39:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 419 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.1% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,243 of 20,442 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the article peer group.

This month, Dinaw Mengestu quit as president of PEN America—an organization dedicated to defending literature and free expression—to protest its publication of “A Silent Moratorium,” a report on Israeli and Jewish writers who described facing rising isolation and exclusion. 
The article featured interviews with some 30 writers, editors, and agents who described being ostracized, demonized, and silenced for failing to disavow Israel—and in some cases, for simply being Jewish. 
The piece was denounced by Mengestu, a novelist and journalist, as an “unethical” attempt to interfere with the “constitutional rights” of supporters of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. 
He said the piece was part of PEN America’s “ongoing failure to defend free expression fairly and equitably.” 
When he was hired in December, Mengestu declared that “If we do not make room for the plurality and range of voices embodied in our literature, we endanger not only our culture, but our democracy.” 
That noble aim is incompatible with the zero-sum logic of the BDS movement, which makes “freeing Palestine” contingent on erasing Israel, and insists on anathematizing voices at odds with its master narrative. 
The word “Orwellian” has lost its sting in a world where the mayor of New York promises to enforce “international law” by arresting the prime minister of Israel—in compliance with a court that has no jurisdiction in the United States or Israel—and where an Ivy League student accuses Columbia’s administration of withholding “basic humanitarian aid” because it will not send snacks and water to students illegally occupying a building in the name of “freeing Palestine.” 
But Orwellian is indeed the word, as William Kolbrener, who teaches creative writing at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, demonstrates below in his beautiful open letter to Mengestu. 
One of those interviewed for “A Silent Moratorium,” Kolbrener speaks in the name of the Israelis—Christian, Muslim, and Jewish—whose homeless writing he did his best to publish, and whose voices, like his own, testify that a commitment to free speech, literature, and democracy still matters. 
You resigned this month as president of PEN America, an organization founded to defend writers, to protest a report it had published,  A Silent Moratorium .” 
The report documented something plain: Israeli and Jewish writers have been quietly pushed out of literary life since October 7, 2023—dropped from festivals, passed over for translation or publication, and struck from prize lists. 
You called this an “unethical” legal campaign that threatened the rights of those who wished to silence them. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.5%William Kolbrener: 10.4%The FP: 6.1%Confirmation Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 33.2%William Kolbrener: 17.0%The FP: 4.1%Availability Heuristic33.2%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 1.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%William Kolbrener: 1.6%The FP: 10.1%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%William Kolbrener: 2.8%The FP: 1.1%Optimism Bias8.4%This article: 7.6%William Kolbrener: 2.5%The FP: 1.4%Pessimism Bias7.6%This article: 39.9%William Kolbrener: 22.0%The FP: 10.9%Negativity Bias39.9%This article: 11.2%William Kolbrener: 3.7%The FP: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%William Kolbrener: 9.7%The FP: 1.7%In-Group Bias10.7%This article: 7.6%William Kolbrener: 5.1%The FP: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias7.6%This article: 10.7%William Kolbrener: 3.6%The FP: 2.0%Halo Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 2.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%William Kolbrener: 2.1%The FP: 1.2%Primacy Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%William Kolbrener: 2.4%The FP: 2.0%Ad Hominem2.4%This article: 7.6%William Kolbrener: 16.5%The FP: 0.8%Straw Man7.6%This article: 10.7%William Kolbrener: 3.6%The FP: 3.1%Appeal to Authority10.7%This article: 16.0%William Kolbrener: 5.3%The FP: 2.5%False Dilemma16.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 2.8%The FP: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.1%William Kolbrener: 22.6%The FP: 8.8%Hasty Generalization8.1%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.9%William Kolbrener: 14.7%The FP: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion17.9%This article: 8.4%William Kolbrener: 2.8%The FP: 1.6%Begging the Question8.4%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 11.2%William Kolbrener: 3.7%The FP: 0.6%Burden of Proof11.2%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 10.7%William Kolbrener: 3.6%The FP: 0.4%Composition/Division10.7%This article: 17.9%William Kolbrener: 6.0%The FP: 3.2%Anecdotal17.9%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.9%William Kolbrener: 6.0%The FP: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.9%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 8.1%William Kolbrener: 2.7%The FP: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection8.1%This article: 20.8%William Kolbrener: 15.7%The FP: 15.4%Biased Writer Voice20.8%This article: 8.4%William Kolbrener: 2.8%The FP: 2.8%Indoctrination8.4%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 11.1%The FP: 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%William Kolbrener: 0.0%The FP: 4.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

419 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers35%attributed speech274writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDinaw Mengestu • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDinaw Mengestu • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDinaw Mengestu • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 75 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Kolbrener • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageDinaw Mengestu • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

William Kolbrener

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words31% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+84.7 ptsWriter: 15.3%William Kolbrener: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-12.4 ptsWriter: 12.4%William Kolbrener: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.