Topic summary
89% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hypocrisy results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 3,859 hits . Analysis detected 19,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,685 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (5,637 of 15,447 topics). This Hypocrisy is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Hypocrisy
Topic details
Total words: 10,685
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 36.1% 36.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst