Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video101.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Kolbrener results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Composition/Division, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 365.687 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,989 of 28,364 speakers). This William Kolbrener is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
William Kolbrener
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠55%William Kolbrener (selected)36%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 101.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
35.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos101.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.8%50.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 43.0%43.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 36.3%36.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.4%27.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 19.2%Straw Man: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos