Topic summary
86% 18 analyzed articles/videos 14,950 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Censorship results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 10,841 hits . Analysis detected 81,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 67,306 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,178 of 16,285 topics). This Censorship is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Censorship
Topic details
Total words: 67,306
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score18 analyzed articles67.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst