Author summary
64%9 analyzed articles/videos5,875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chrishaun Baker results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 7,925 hits. Analysis detected 40,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,975 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,972 of 6,259 authors). This Chrishaun Baker is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Chrishaun Baker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
53%Chrishaun Baker (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 31,975
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles32K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate