Author summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Perez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 484 hits . Analysis detected 3,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,371 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,680 of 6,226 authors). This Daniel Perez is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Daniel Perez
Author details
Total words: 4,371
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst