Publication summary
74%58 analyzed articles/videos11,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The FP results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 10,757 hits. Analysis detected 85,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,557 analyzed words across 58 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (145 of 409 publications). This The FP is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
The FP
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
65%The FP (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

65% percentile
025507510064.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score58 analyzed articles69.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 9.9%9.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Publication 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate