Publication summary
74% 58 analyzed articles/videos 11,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The FP results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 10,757 hits . Analysis detected 85,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,557 analyzed words across 58 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (145 of 409 publications). This The FP is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 69,557
Article count: 58
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score58 analyzed articles69.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst