Author summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maya Sulkin results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 943 faulty-reasoning hits from 807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Maya Sulkin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maya Sulkin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Sneha Dey1%
ā 0%Ideastream Public Media1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
ā 0%Maya Sulkin (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 807
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles807 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.3%25.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 6.4%6.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 5.7%5.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Primacy Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos