Author summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Burchill results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 3,281 hits . Analysis detected 19,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,355 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,105 of 6,172 authors). This Julie Burchill is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Julie Burchill
Author details
Total words: 8,355
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.1% percentile 4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 39.3% 39.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 19.2% 19.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.3% 23.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 17.4% 17.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.1% 26.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.3%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 19.2%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 12.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst