Topic summary
70% 121 analyzed articles/videos 67,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Change results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 38,083 hits . Analysis detected 341,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 385,617 analyzed words across 121 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,978 of 15,752 topics). This Climate Change is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Climate Change
Topic details
Total words: 385,617
Article count: 121
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score121 analyzed articles385.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst