Keyword summary
64% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canada Wildfires results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 680 hits . Analysis detected 3,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,664 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,309 of 37,533 keywords). This Canada Wildfires is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Canada Wildfires
Keyword details
Total words: 5,664
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst