NBC News33%

Canada wildfire smoke map: Health risks as poor air quality hits the Midwest and northern states 33%

By Ashley Mowreader51%

7/17/2026, 10:21:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 943 faulty-reasoning hits from 597 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of 33% (13,745 of 20,517 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the article peer group.

Hot summer days are getting stuffier for more than 100 million people in the U.S. as wildfire smoke drifts south and imposes dangerous risks to their health. 
Hundreds of wildfires burning in Canada have created a thick wave of smoke that’s shrouding swaths of the U.S. from Milwaukee to Washington, D.C., in unhealthy air. 
As of Thursday, more than 800 wildfires are actively burning across Canada, with large clusters in Ontario near the border with Minnesota. 
A heat wave across North America is trapping the unhealthy air and carrying it south. 
With smoky air comes certain health risks. 
The Environmental Protection Agency uses a measure called the Air Quality Index to assess how polluted the air is. 
Scores of 100 or more (out of 500) mean the air is unhealthy and could harm people’s health. 
Some U.S. cities  including Chicago, Detroit, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh and Washington  had ratings of more than 200 and led the world in rankings for worst air quality on Friday, according to data from air pollution monitoring company IQAir. 
Parts of Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin had AQI ratings in the 300s on Friday afternoon  levels high enough that experts advise avoiding outdoor activities. 
In response, public health officials have issued air quality advisories and suspended some government operations. 
New York launched emergency operations Wednesday, offering free KN95 masks and opening shelter space. 
Due to deteriorating air quality, Philadelphia city officials suspended trash pickup and closed public pools Friday. 
High levels of particle-laden air can exacerbate health concerns for those considered sensitive, including children, pregnant individuals, older adults and those with asthma or heart conditions. 
Higher levels are dangerous for any who breathe it, and people should be extra careful with wildfire smoke, said Suzanne Paulson, director of the Center for Clean Air at the University of California, Los Angeles. 
“No particles are good to breathe, but wildfire particles seem to be more toxic than regular urban particles themselves,” Paulson told NBC News. 
“Whatever the [AQI] color is, consider that it’s the next color up if there’s a lot of wildfire smoke.” 
Wildfire smoke consists of microscopic particulate matter, ash and trace minerals that, combined with water vapor, create the haze effect. 
Small particulate matter, called PM2.5, is the most dangerous because it can be deeply inhaled, penetrating the lungs and even entering the bloodstream. 
PM2.5 particles are smaller than a grain of sand and 30 times smaller than the width of a hair strand, said Serap Erdal, a professor at the University of Illinois, Chicago, and the project leader of Open Air Chicago, a citywide network of air sensors. 
The best way to protect yourself is to stay indoors and avoid physical activity outside in areas with exceptionally high air quality indexes, experts say. 
Keeping children indoors limits their exposure to the pollutants and can reduce their level of activity, which decreases the amount of particles they breathe in, Paulson said. 
Using an air purifier or setting your air conditioning on recirculate can also help recycle the air and clear out toxins, Erdal said. 
“Just because we’re indoors doesn’t mean we’re not inhaling outdoor air.” 
When outside, wearing high-quality particle masks like N95 or KN95 can reduce exposure. 
A regular surgical mask can provide a slight barrier but will not filter out small particles, Erdal said. 
“Although healthy people may recover quickly from wildfire smoke, many people can experience short-term, mid-term and long-term effects,” Erdal said. 
“It’s important that people take measures to protect themselves.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Ashley Mowreader: 1.9%NBC News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias6.2%This article: 12.6%Ashley Mowreader: 4.9%NBC News: 2.9%Availability Heuristic12.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Ashley Mowreader: 2.1%NBC News: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias6.9%This article: 2.7%Ashley Mowreader: 4.0%NBC News: 6.2%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 5.9%Ashley Mowreader: 1.8%NBC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion5.9%This article: 6.5%Ashley Mowreader: 2.0%NBC News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Ashley Mowreader: 1.4%NBC News: 1.3%Pessimism Bias4.5%This article: 22.6%Ashley Mowreader: 13.3%NBC News: 7.0%Negativity Bias22.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.8%NBC News: 4.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 1.1%NBC News: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 38.7%Ashley Mowreader: 13.2%NBC News: 2.8%Appeal to Authority38.7%This article: 3.2%Ashley Mowreader: 2.3%NBC News: 1.2%False Dilemma3.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.7%Ashley Mowreader: 2.7%NBC News: 3.1%Hasty Generalization8.7%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.5%Ashley Mowreader: 5.4%NBC News: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion4.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.5%Ashley Mowreader: 0.8%NBC News: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 1.1%NBC News: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%Ashley Mowreader: 2.4%NBC News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%Ashley Mowreader: 4.2%NBC News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote7.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.7%Ashley Mowreader: 1.6%NBC News: 4.3%Biased Writer Voice2.7%This article: 14.7%Ashley Mowreader: 5.8%NBC News: 1.1%Indoctrination14.7%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Mowreader: 3.4%NBC News: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

597 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers40%attributed speech359writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageEnvironmental Protection Agency • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSuzanne Paulson • 35 words • 100.0% coverageSuzanne Paulson • 23 words • 100.0% coverageSuzanne Paulson • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSerap Erdal • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageSuzanne Paulson • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSerap Erdal • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSerap Erdal • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSerap Erdal • 20 words • 100.0% coverageSerap Erdal • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Suzanne Paulson

74%flagged-word coverage
104 attributed words44% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Indoctrination+45.0 ptsWriter: 7.0%Suzanne Paulson: 51.9%51.9%Unattributed Quote+22.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Suzanne Paulson: 22.1%22.1%Biased Writer Voice-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Suzanne Paulson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.