Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne Paulson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 308 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,199 of 28,364 speakers). This Suzanne Paulson is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Suzanne Paulson
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
16.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.1%11.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos