Topic summary
34% 17 analyzed articles/videos 6,590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Smoke results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 4,158 hits . Analysis detected 37,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,142 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,126 of 16,562 topics). This Wildfire Smoke is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group. Wildfire Smoke
Topic details
Total words: 39,142
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score17 analyzed articles39.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst