Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Peter J. Winch results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 329 hits . Analysis detected 3,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Peter J. Winch is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Peter J. Winch
Author details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst